Production

NDI is not free just because it stays on your LAN

It finds the other machine on its own and just works. Then you add a third source and the whole thing falls over, on a gigabit network you were told was plenty.

4 August 2026Production

NDI sends video over your network. No capture card, no cable to run, discovery handled for you.

The setup is so easy that people skip the part where they work out what it costs.

What one stream needs

Full NDI uses light compression on purpose. It keeps quality high and latency low. It pays for both with bandwidth.

Budget roughly 100 to 160 Mbps for one 1080p60 stream. A gigabit link carries a handful. After that, everything else on the network gets squeezed.

Two cameras and a screen share is half your gigabit. That is before the return feed to a monitor.

The version people should be using

NDI HX compresses hard and needs a fraction of the bandwidth. It costs latency and some quality. For a camera feed into a scene, take the trade.

What breaks first

Building it so it holds

SetupWhat it supports
Gigabit, unmanaged switchTwo or three full NDI streams. More on HX.
Gigabit, managed switchSame bandwidth, but you can see where it goes and control multicast.
2.5 gigabit or 10 gigabitFull NDI at production scale. The right answer for a fixed studio.
Dedicated video networkVideo traffic never competes with anything else. What broadcast does.

The cheap discipline

Put the video machines on their own switch. Give each one a cable. Keep internet traffic on a different path where you can.

Then test at full load before you need it. NDI answers contention by dropping frames. It does that during the show, not during setup.

Sources

The Rig Wire reports on streaming technology from public documentation, source repositories and vendor releases. We did not bench-test what is described here. When we have tested something, we say so.